Archive for the ‘Warming & Cooling’ Category

More Evidence that the Sun, Not Man, Controls Earth’s TemperatureJuly 8th, 2009 by E. Calvin Beisner

In his book The Chilling Stars, Henrik Svensmark explains his theory that changes in solar magnetic wind output could control changes in cloud formation on Earth and thus control changes in Earth’s surface temperature. Here’s how it works: Earth is bathed in a current of cosmic rays coming from other stars in and beyond the Milky Way. When cosmic rays collide with certain molecules in our atmosphere, they break those apart and form new compounds, some of which, electrically charged, are excellent nuclei for condensation of water vapor–that is, for the formation of clouds. Clouds, in turn, have a net cooling effect on the Earth by reflecting solar energy back into space before it reaches the surface.

The cosmic ray current isn’t steady. It varies. The stronger it is, the more clouds form, cooling the Earth–and vice versa. But what causes cosmic ray current to vary? Svensmark has shown very strong correlation between it and the strength of solar magnetic wind–the two vary in tandem, and the solar wind, in turn, varies in tandem with solar energy output. Many scientists, including those working with the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, long thought the variation in solar energy output (about 0.1%) was simply too slight to explain late twentieth-century global warming, but they were considering only the energy flux. If Svensmark is right, then solar energy flux is magnified by solar wind flux’s effect on cosmic rays and, through them, on cloud formation.

Svensmark argues that the solar wind/cosmic ray/cloud connection is sufficient to explain the vast majority of all observed global temperature change. Not all scientists accept his theory, and some have even called it discredited. But the world’s largest particle physics laboratory, CERN (the European Organization for Nuclear Research), which funded Svensmark’s earlier research, has now funded more comprehensive research, indicating that its leaders respect the work. It could spell the end of manmade global warming doom-saying, as suggested by the powerful correlation shown in the accompanying graph.

Click here to view the graph.

Quiet Sun a harbinger of cooler Earth?June 17th, 2009 by The WeGetIt.org Team
NOAA predicts a quiter sun

NOAA: “The next solar cycle will be below average in intensity.”

The Canadian Wheat Board warns that cool temperatures have delayed growth of western Canada’s wheat and barley crops by at least 10 days and put them at risk of damage from frosts. “You’re pushing development into a period with better likelihood of getting a frost,” said Bruce Burnett, director of weather and market analysis for the Canadian Wheat Board. “It’s not particularly what we need at this moment. It’s just too cool.” In the Southern Hemisphere, Brazil has reduced its corn output forecast for the same reason.

Both may be due to global coolingdriven by a quiet Sun.

The number of sunspots correlates closely with Earth’s sea surface temperature–much more closely than changes in atmospheric greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide.

NOAA predicts a quiter sun

Record-low sunspot numbers over the past two years suggest that Earth could be heading into what one blogger calls “Little Ice Age II, The Sequel.” The original Little Ice Age, from about A.D. 1300 to 1850, brought devastating crop failures and greater storminess all over the Northern Hemisphere and probably the Southern as well, and the global warming since then has been largely or perhaps entirely a natural recovery from that cool period.

Keep that in mind the next time you hear dire warnings of manmade global warming.

Climate alarm produces dangerous plans, environmental damageJune 17th, 2009 by E. Calvin Beisner

As global warming hysteria increases, some people are turning their attention in another direction: geo-engineering.

The aim is to cool the earth by reducing the amount of the Sun’s energy that reaches planet’s surface. According to one advocate, the two most promising methods are injecting sulfates into the atmosphere (mimicking “massive volcanic eruptions”), and increasing cloudiness.

“To trigger a drop in global temperatures, we’d need to loft between two million and 10 million tons of sulfur dioxide (which combines with oxygen to form sulfate particles) into the lower stratosphere,” saysJames Cascio in The Wall Street Journal. It would have to be repeated every year, since the particles eventually fall out of the atmosphere.

Alternatively, we could inject massive amounts of sea spray into the atmosphere to increase cloudiness, thus reflecting more sunlight back into space.

Both options have significant risks, like causing local or regional flooding and unnatural weather fluctuations. International tensions would arise over who got to choose which nations would benefit, and which would suffer, from the changes.

With new reports appearing frequently showing the dubious scientific basis of manmade global warming fears ; hard data showing that we’ve had about 7 to 8 years of global cooling; and the likelihood,discussed previously, that a quiet solar cycle will bring on yet more global cooling, it seems imprudent at best to think about purposely trying to cool the Earth.

If one thing’s clear, our understanding of the incredibly complex climate system is in its infancy. That would suggest that we move slowly on intentionally trying to control it.