Archive for the ‘Pollution’ Category

Old Testament lifestyle in modern timesJuly 1st, 2009 by E. Calvin Beisner
Millions still live hand-to-mouth.

The abject poverty of the widow in 1 Kings 17 represents
the daily life of millions of our poorest neighbors.

Lost in much of the legislative debate is the effect that policies like cap and trade have on our very poorest neighbors. We would do well to remember.

In one of the most poignant stories in the Old Testament (1 Kings 17:8-24 ), God sends the Prophet Elijah, endangered by wicked King Ahab and Queen Jezebel, to live in Zarephath with a widow and her son. On arriving, Elijah finds the widow “gathering sticks” and asks her to give him water and a little bread. “As the LORD lives,” the widow replies, “I do not have bread, only a handful of flour in a bin, and a little oil in a jar; and see, I am gathering a couple of sticks that I may go in and prepare it for myself and my son, that we may eat it, and die.” God stretches the widow’s food supply and then, when her son gets sick and dies, raises him from the dead, confirming through these miracles that Elijah is His prophet.

Although most people in the wealthy West aren’t aware of it, the life–and death–described in that story remains true today for hundreds of millions of women and children around the world, who spend hours every day gathering sticks or dried dung to cook their food and warm their huts. Smoke from the dirty fuels causes tuberculosis and other respiratory diseases that lead to 2 million or more premature deaths and billions of lost work hours every year–magnifying the poverty these people experience.

In the absence of miracle-working prophets, these people need abundant, affordable energy to spare them from such tragedy. That’s why the WeGetIt.org Declaration says, “With billions suffering in poverty, environmental policies must not further oppress the world’s poor by denying them basic needs. Instead, we must help people fulfill their God-given potential as producers and stewards.” Ask your friends to join you in signing the Declaration today.

Offshore drilling can reduce oil pollutionOctober 1st, 2008 by E. Calvin Beisner

About 42,000 gallons of oil a day go into the ocean in the Santa Barbara channel off the California coast, often resulting in dirty, ugly globs of oil on the beaches.

Evidence that offshore drilling causes pollution? No. Not according to University of California geophysics Professor Bruce Luyendyk, who recently explained to Santa Barbara residents–many of whom remember the horrendous Union Oil rig spill in 1969 that spilled 100,000 barrels into the sea, provoking outrage that launched the first Earth Day–that the oil seeps up naturally through the floor of the ocean.

The seeps can’t be stopped, but the rate of seepage could be slowed. How? By pumping the oil from the ocean floor, reducing pressure and thus slowing the seepage.

The same goes for natural gas, about 3 million cubic feet per day of which seep through the ocean floor–enough to serve 10,000 homes.

A new organization, SOS California (Stop Oil Seeps), is calling for more drilling to stop the waste and pollution from oil and gas seepage.

The same geological principles operate worldwide, though offshore seepage rates vary. That makes pollution prevention and resource waste reduction additional arguments–along with making energy more affordable–for increased offshore drilling.

Beijing Bolsters Modest Air Quality Gains with Fictitious Data, Strong-Arm TacticsAugust 20th, 2008 by The WeGetIt.org Team

Media worldwide report air quality improvements achieved in Beijing for the Olympics. While they should not be entirely discounted, they are exaggerated–and how they were achieved raises questions.

Improvements were sought by closing scores of factories, stopping construction, and removing about 2 million vehicles from roads. Improvements were modest, with only few a days, caused mainly by rain, when particulate pollution–the most dangerous–met World Health Organization standards. Relocating measurement stations invalidated comparisons with past data, creating a fictitious drop. Independent measurements found pollution levels about three times government reports.

Lessons?

Negative: Perverse incentives generate fraudulent environmental claims. In rich countries, environmental advocates and government agencies, to justify their work, often exaggerate dangers (e.g., global warming claims, some resting on data invalidated by relocating measuring stations). In poor countries, governments often understate dangers for public relations, or overstate to attract aid from rich countries.

Positive: Environmental improvement can accompany economic development–Beijing’s air seems cleaner than ten years ago. Free-market economies can achieve environmental and economic improvement together without China’s strong-arm tactics. But environmental improvement achieved only by shutting down industries is likely temporary, as Beijing’s will be when factories start up again. And air-cleansing rain demonstrates Earth’s resiliency.

One last point: The cost of putting on this Olympics, whatever it is, must be raised by the lost value of over two months’ factory shutdowns and construction stoppages–probably billions of dollars–not to mention inconvenience to citizens forbidden to drive every other day.