Archive for the ‘Development & Aid’ Category

Old Testament lifestyle in modern timesJuly 1st, 2009 by E. Calvin Beisner
Millions still live hand-to-mouth.

The abject poverty of the widow in 1 Kings 17 represents
the daily life of millions of our poorest neighbors.

Lost in much of the legislative debate is the effect that policies like cap and trade have on our very poorest neighbors. We would do well to remember.

In one of the most poignant stories in the Old Testament (1 Kings 17:8-24 ), God sends the Prophet Elijah, endangered by wicked King Ahab and Queen Jezebel, to live in Zarephath with a widow and her son. On arriving, Elijah finds the widow “gathering sticks” and asks her to give him water and a little bread. “As the LORD lives,” the widow replies, “I do not have bread, only a handful of flour in a bin, and a little oil in a jar; and see, I am gathering a couple of sticks that I may go in and prepare it for myself and my son, that we may eat it, and die.” God stretches the widow’s food supply and then, when her son gets sick and dies, raises him from the dead, confirming through these miracles that Elijah is His prophet.

Although most people in the wealthy West aren’t aware of it, the life–and death–described in that story remains true today for hundreds of millions of women and children around the world, who spend hours every day gathering sticks or dried dung to cook their food and warm their huts. Smoke from the dirty fuels causes tuberculosis and other respiratory diseases that lead to 2 million or more premature deaths and billions of lost work hours every year–magnifying the poverty these people experience.

In the absence of miracle-working prophets, these people need abundant, affordable energy to spare them from such tragedy. That’s why the WeGetIt.org Declaration says, “With billions suffering in poverty, environmental policies must not further oppress the world’s poor by denying them basic needs. Instead, we must help people fulfill their God-given potential as producers and stewards.” Ask your friends to join you in signing the Declaration today.

What’s our most important environmental challenge?July 1st, 2009 by The WeGetIt.org Team

Today, many environmental concerns clamor for attention and investment. Some people point to possible climate change as the greatest threat facing the planet, proposing multi-trillion dollar efforts to prevent predicted global warming. Others prefer to concentrate on addressing more immediate problems such as air and water pollution, toxic and nontoxic solid wastes, contamination of land and waterways by agricultural chemicals and wastes, deforestation, and habitat and species loss.

How do we prioritize these challenges? What is the most important environmental task facing American Christians today?

study of those questions sponsored by the Institute on Religion and Democracy came to a surprising conclusion: The most important step toward improved environmental stewardship is economic development, because it enables societies to afford effective creation care. And the most important challenge to that goal? In light of widespread confusion about environmental issues, it’s getting reliable information to citizens and policymakers alike.

Inconvenient numbers: Warming believer crunches the numbersMay 13th, 2009 by The WeGetIt.org Team

Danish economist and statistician Bjorn Lomborg, whose books The Skeptical Environmentalist and Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist’s Guide to Global Warming make him the nemesis of global warming alarmists, just keeps on saying sensible things.

In an interview with San Francisco Examiner environmental policy writer Thomas Fuller, Lomborg pointed out that, “with every dollar you invest in very quick CO2 cuts” like cap-and-trade, “you probably do less than a dollar’s worth of good.”

If you take into account what kind of policy measures come up, it might be as low as 4 cents for every dollar, whereas if you invest in research and development that is bringing better technology for the future, you can end up doing as much as $16 worth of good for every dollar invested. My basic point is that I’d much rather do $16 worth of good rather than 4 cents.

Despite his belief that manmade warming is real, Lomborg concludes that harm to humanity from unwise policies to cut CO2 emissions will exceed that from warming itself. His position gets considerable support from studies by the Copenhagen Consensus, under which Nobel Prize-winning economists and others study and rank various risks to humanity and alternative solutions to them. Copenhagen Consensusranks  R&D in low-carbon energy technologies 14th out of 30, but a combination of R&D and mitigation 29th and mitigation alone 30th.